From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May 12 13:04:37 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E492737B401
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 May 2003 13:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailbox.univie.ac.at (mail.univie.ac.at [131.130.1.27])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98BAF43F3F
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 May 2003 13:04:36 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from l.ertl@univie.ac.at)
Received: from [10.0.0.2] (adslle.cc.univie.ac.at [131.130.102.11])
	by mailbox.univie.ac.at (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h4CK4M81154304;
	Mon, 12 May 2003 22:04:28 +0200
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 22:04:22 +0200 (CEST)
From: Lukas Ertl <l.ertl@univie.ac.at>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20030512215835.V600@korben.in.tern>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
X-DCC-ZID-Univie-Metrics: mx1 4261; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2
cc: mb@imp.ch
Subject: Re: Dump(8) hosed on CURRENT
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 20:04:38 -0000

Martin Blapp wrote:

> > > dump -C 32 -a0f dumpfile /usr
> >
> > Shouldn't you use -L when dumping live filesystems, especially with
> > such a big cachesize?
>
> Yes, I'm using -L too altough I'm in single user mode. I forgot it on
> the line.
>
> Heh, of course -L may be broken. Didn't thought that before.

I now did a test with dump -L on a live filesystem, and I've seen the
"file expected but not found" error, too. There's obviously something
broken, we should check if it's related to -L or if it happens always.

regards,
le

--=20
Lukas Ertl                             eMail: l.ertl@univie.ac.at
UNIX-Systemadministrator               Tel.:  (+43 1) 4277-14073
Zentraler Informatikdienst (ZID)       Fax.:  (+43 1) 4277-9140
der Universit=E4t Wien                   http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~le/