Date: Thu, 04 Apr 1996 02:25:42 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NO_PACKAGE and NO_CDROM Message-ID: <6204.828613542@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 04 Apr 1996 02:22:39 PST." <199604041022.CAA05276@sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Last time I mentioned it, someone said it's the number of files that > affects the size of supscan, not the amount (in megabytes), and that > was the reason of the ports collection being split up. I think it was > Rod that mentioned it. I'm running one right now for a `ports-all' collection and will see how it looks. If it runs less than 10 minutes and doesn't show up as the #1 culprit in top, I'll probably let it live. > I'm not exactly sure about the memory situation of freefall and what > the coeffecient (assuming it's a linear function) but I think the > trouble is a bit too much, having to update supfiles all over the > place every time we add something. We need to put more memory into freefall, this is true. I'll get out my begging hat.. :-) Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6204.828613542>