From owner-cvs-sys  Tue Oct 10 04:54:08 1995
Return-Path: owner-cvs-sys
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id EAA00567
          for cvs-sys-outgoing; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 04:54:08 -0700
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA00558
          ; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 04:53:54 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id EAA02445; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 04:53:06 -0700
To: Peter Wemm <peter@jhome.dialix.com>
cc: sos@freebsd.org, swallace@freefall.freebsd.org, jkh@freebsd.org,
        CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sys@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/ibcs2 - Imported sources 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 10 Oct 1995 18:51:26 +0800."
             <Pine.BSF.3.91.951010183928.396B-100000@jhome.DIALix.COM> 
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 1995 04:53:06 -0700
Message-ID: <2443.813325986@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-cvs-sys@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> While I certainly would agree that he could have handled the import 
> better..  He stomped on Bruce's work area as well.

I think "stomped" is a little harsh.  Bruce has been slowly improving
prototypes and such throughout the system, and it's in the nature of
such work to occasionally be underfoot.  I doubt whether Steven even
knew that Bruce was still in there.

> IMHO, it really should have waited till after 2.1 was out, because David 
> has explicitly requested to hold back on importing stuff as it was making 
> his life difficult.  There are other things that some of us are holding 
> back on for this reason.. It's kinda annoying to see others bypass the 
> request...    Sigh. Oh well.

Well, there's no code freeze on 2.2 that I'm aware of - work should be
allowed to go forward in 2.2-current.  I think David's objections are
more to all the commits with the little "please put this in 2.1"
postit notes attached.  AFAIK, Steven has no intention of trying to
get this into 2.1.

> Still, hopefully we end up with a more complete ibcs2 as a result.. :-)  

Yes, that's my attitude.  Motion in -current is good, even if it
sometimes takes awhile to get it going in exactly the right
direction(s). Let's see what positive progress we can make out of
Steven's commit now - I'm eager to see which binaries we can run now!
:)

					Jordan