From owner-freebsd-java Wed Jul 10 16:58:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B0DE37B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:58:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gnuppy.monkey.org (wsip68-15-8-100.sd.sd.cox.net [68.15.8.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC0F43E31 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:58:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billh@gnuppy.monkey.org) Received: from billh by gnuppy.monkey.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17SRLi-0000tV-00; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:58:22 -0700 Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:58:22 -0700 To: Nate Williams Cc: "Georg-W. Koltermann" , freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG, Bill Huey Subject: Re: FreeBSD OS version for HotSpot (was: 1.3.1 patchset 7 not quite ready) Message-ID: <20020710235822.GA3402@gnuppy.monkey.org> References: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E452205FDA83A@l04.research.kpn.com> <20020710102904.GA3882@gnuppy.monkey.org> <1026333648.676.22.camel@hunter.muc.macsch.com> <20020710232517.GB2394@gnuppy.monkey.org> <15660.50045.80305.351508@emerger.yogotech.com> <20020710234416.GD2394@gnuppy.monkey.org> <15660.50999.28887.442198@emerger.yogotech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <15660.50999.28887.442198@emerger.yogotech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Bill Huey Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 05:45:59PM -0600, Nate Williams wrote: > I believe Dan is going to do this, but until that happens, why not just > leave the -stable support in place? It certainly isn't hurting > anything. There's another subtle bug in -stable that isn't worth it for me to track it down, which just gives me more reason to abandon -stable since it won't run correctly on it anyways even with my hacks. It directly includes a private pthreads header... I'd like to keep things clean by removing a lot of the sloppiness in the current tree. What I commited was a snapshot of my development tree and was in no way designed for general consumption and I don't expect folks to clean up after me. If there's a compelling reason for me to keep -stable, then I'm open to suggestions such as large body of folks that can only run -stable because they have only 1 machine, etc... bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message