Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 21:55:16 +0200 From: Marcus von Appen <mva@sysfault.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dropping X11BASE in favour for LOCALBASE Message-ID: <20061019195516.GC2023@medusa.sysfault.org> In-Reply-To: <20061019191801.GA34713@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20061019160142.GA2023@medusa.sysfault.org> <20061019191801.GA34713@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ABTtc+pdwF7KHXCz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On, Thu Oct 19, 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 06:01:42PM +0200, Marcus von Appen wrote: > > Hi, > >=20 > > according to the status report sent around today, X11BASE should be > > dropped in favour for LOCALBASE. > >=20 > > Is there an actual schedule until when this should happen and how should > > we deal with our current ports now? Just remove the USE_X_PREFIX macro > > when we submit new PRs for (our) existing ports or anything besides > > that?=20 > >=20 > > A further explanation why that move shall happen would be great, too :-= ). >=20 > It can only possibly happen after a team of interested people have put > in the work to fix the several thousand ports that have hard-coded > knowledge of /usr/X11R6 (i.e. which do not respect X11BASE anyway). So what was the announcement about then? Was the X11BASE vs. LOCALBASE section within it just a generalization of the GNOME changes and X11BASE will be kept? Or should we maintainers switch to LOCALBASE whenever possible from now on? Regards Marcus --ABTtc+pdwF7KHXCz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFN9gko/JpszXavhwRAjmYAKCFOZf8ekXg046vrRZOVMeW5lS4OQCeKI2s oxDeZUaLqoGM8XJQ61kx2eE= =iOFj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ABTtc+pdwF7KHXCz--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061019195516.GC2023>