Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 12:53:18 +1100 From: nano <nanotek@bsdbox.co> To: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org>, LuKreme <kremels@kreme.com> Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: postfix depends on db41?? Message-ID: <b458fcbd-e10e-452b-acf0-eff0836c7ebb@email.android.com> In-Reply-To: <44d2i8w0ab.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> References: <6BC7F72E-32AE-42B5-A7FB-01849F05178C@kreme.com> <44d2i8w0ab.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
What's the proper use for: WITH_$PORT_VER= DEFAULT_$PORT_VER= $PORT_PORT= Example: WITH_BDB_VER=5 DEFAULT_PGSQL_VER=93 APACHE_PORT=www/apache24 Are they essentially interchangeable and achieve the same result? Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org> wrote: >LuKreme <kremels@kreme.com> writes: > >> # portmaster mail/postfix210 >> [...] >> ===>>> Gathering dependency list for mail/postfix210 from ports >> ===>>> Launching child to install databases/db41 >> >> ===>>> postfix210-2.10.3,1 >> databases/db41 (1/1) >> >> Why? >> >> postfix certainly does *not* require db41, and make.conf is set for >version 5.3 >> >> # cat /etc/make.conf >> WITH_PKGNG=yes >> WITH_BDB_VERS=5.3 > >You mean WITH_BDB_VER (no 'S')? >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 28 05:40:18 2014 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 007C78D4 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 05:40:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B969011C2 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 05:40:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [204.210.114.114] ([204.210.114.114:45354] helo=localhost.hawaii.res.rr.com) by cdptpa-oedge02 (envelope-from <parv@pair.com>) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id A2/BE-30151-A3120135; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 05:40:11 +0000 Received: by localhost.hawaii.res.rr.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0CE1B5C25; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 19:40:20 -1000 (HST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 19:40:19 -1000 From: parv@pair.com To: Chris H <bsd-lists@1command.com> Subject: Re: DBIx::Simple: Any user? New maintainer? Message-ID: <20140228054019.GA2038@holstein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Chris H <bsd-lists@1command.com>, f-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, perl@freebsd.org, pi@opsec.eu, hvo.pm@xs4all.nl References: <20140223095134.GA1610@holstein.holy.cow> <e4a0824e48a6355c9daee75280b1b999.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <e4a0824e48a6355c9daee75280b1b999.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.130:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Cc: perl@freebsd.org, pi@opsec.eu, hvo.pm@xs4all.nl, f-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>, <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>, <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 05:40:18 -0000 Hi there, in message <e4a0824e48a6355c9daee75280b1b999.authenticated@ultimatedns.net>, wrote Chris H thusly... > > > I am the current maintainer of databases/p5-DBIx-Simple port (last > > updated on CPAN is 1.35 in 2011). > > > > Are there any user of the port? Have there been problems otherwise? > > (If it is not obvious, I am not an user.) > > > > While here, would anybody want to pick up the maintainership? > > Yes, I use it. Good to hear. > Yes. I have time, and would be happy to maintain it. Rather overwhelming display of love DBIx::Simple got! :-) I have submitted a PR to reset port maintainer; keep an eye out for it. I cannot appoint anyone to be one; please choose amongst yourselves. --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b458fcbd-e10e-452b-acf0-eff0836c7ebb>