From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec 15 06:58:39 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4094B16A41F
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 06:58:39 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl)
Received: from kweetal.tue.nl (kweetal.tue.nl [131.155.3.6])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667E943D5E
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 06:58:30 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by kweetal.tue.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BEC013BAB3;
	Thu, 15 Dec 2005 07:58:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from kweetal.tue.nl ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (kweetal.tue.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 36227-03; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 07:58:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from umta.win.tue.nl (umta.win.tue.nl [131.155.71.100])
	by kweetal.tue.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A425313BAA0;
	Thu, 15 Dec 2005 07:58:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (pcwin002 [131.155.71.72])
	by umta.win.tue.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A169131401C;
	Thu, 15 Dec 2005 07:58:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 9999340BA; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 07:58:26 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 07:58:26 +0100
From: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl>
To: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com>
Message-ID: <20051215065826.GY912@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>
References: <20051215002618.B4D3B5D07@ptavv.es.net>
	<43A0E607.2030101@alumni.rice.edu> <43A0E916.7070204@samsco.org>
	<43A0EC9F.9080800@paradise.net.nz> <43A0FC61.3060704@rogers.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <43A0FC61.3060704@rogers.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-Bright-Idea: Let's abolish HTML mail!
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at tue.nl
Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
Subject: Re: kernel cpu entries
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 06:58:39 -0000

On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 12:17:21AM -0500, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> >Is a minor update to the handbook needed in order avoid confusion 
> >then? e.g. I have been commenting out CPU_I586 on all my PIII systems 
> >in the (mistaken it would seem) belief that having CPU_I686 only was 
> >better.
> 
> Agreed, i have always just used I686, assuming it inherited the features 
> of I586. I think most people will assume this.

I did.

(just another datapoint)

--Stijn

-- 
"I used to think I was indecisive, but now I'm not so sure."