Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:15:50 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 apic_vector.s local_apic.c mp_machdep.c src/sys/i386/include apicvar.h smp.h src/sys/i386/isa clock.c Message-ID: <20050214001550.GA59689@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200502091353.10200.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <200502082025.j18KP72E069507@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050209041221.GA16675@dragon.nuxi.com> <200502091353.10200.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 01:53:10PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > Speaking of benchmarks, how about testing the patches I posted to amd64@? > Specifically, how about benchmarking the atomic patch to change membars to > use the fence instructions? I was really hoping some of the other readers of freebsd-amd64 that always offer "I can't program well, but can test things" would test them. I'm bouncing my amd64 machines too much polishing things for 5.4-RELEASE. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050214001550.GA59689>