From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 14 00:15:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3793616A4CE; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:15:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE19E43D1D; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:15:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1E0FoTb059863; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:15:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1E0FoGx059862; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:15:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:15:50 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20050214001550.GA59689@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200502082025.j18KP72E069507@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050209041221.GA16675@dragon.nuxi.com> <200502091353.10200.jhb@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200502091353.10200.jhb@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 apic_vector.s local_apic.c mp_machdep.c src/sys/i386/include apicvar.h smp.h src/sys/i386/isa clock.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:15:51 -0000 On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 01:53:10PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > Speaking of benchmarks, how about testing the patches I posted to amd64@? > Specifically, how about benchmarking the atomic patch to change membars to > use the fence instructions? I was really hoping some of the other readers of freebsd-amd64 that always offer "I can't program well, but can test things" would test them. I'm bouncing my amd64 machines too much polishing things for 5.4-RELEASE. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)