From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul  1 11:31:12 2009
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EDF91065672;
	Wed,  1 Jul 2009 11:31:12 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de)
Received: from mout2.freenet.de (mout2.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:4])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8AB8FC12;
	Wed,  1 Jul 2009 11:31:11 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de)
Received: from [195.4.92.14] (helo=4.mx.freenet.de)
	by mout2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port
	25) (Exim 4.69 #92)
	id 1MLy1t-0005jL-Ab; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:31:10 +0200
Received: from tfb43.t.pppool.de ([89.55.251.67]:44795
	helo=ernst.jennejohn.org)
	by 4.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25)
	(Exim 4.69 #79) id 1MLy1s-00039K-6Y; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:31:08 +0200
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:31:07 +0200
From: Gary Jennejohn <gary.jennejohn@freenet.de>
To: Marcelo Araujo <araujobsdport@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090701133107.4d952dde@ernst.jennejohn.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090701104451.GA1241@ponderosa.intelbras.com.br>
References: <200906301428.n5UESfiF022149@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20090701073752.GA79351@FreeBSD.org>
	<20090701104451.GA1241@ponderosa.intelbras.com.br>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.2; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-purgate-ID: 149285::1246447868-000009D9-7F411C0A/0-0/0-0
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/lzip Makefile distinfo
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de
List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree
	<cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:31:12 -0000

On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 07:44:51 -0300
Marcelo Araujo <araujobsdport@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 07:37:53AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 02:28:41PM +0000, Marcelo Araujo wrote:
> > > araujo      2009-06-30 14:28:41 UTC
> > > 
> > >   FreeBSD ports repository
> > > 
> > >   Modified files:
> > >     archivers/lzip       Makefile distinfo 
> > >   Log:
> > >   - Update to 1.7.
> > >   
> > >   PR:             based on ports/136003
> > >   Submitted by:   Sylvio Cesar <scjamorim@bsd.com.br> (maintainer)
> > >   Approved by:    maintainer
> > 
> > Why would maintainer need to explicitly approve their changes?
> 
> Hi danfe,
> 
> It is very easy to answer, because he knows better than me if the new
> version is usable or not. The maintainer submitted an update to 1.6, and as
> we have a new release, I feel that was better ask the maintainer about that.
> 
> Generally the maintainer knows better than us what is good or not for your
> ports. Of course everybody knows that.
> 

When the maintainer submits an update to one of his ports then he
rather obviously has also automatically approved the changes.

I think that is what danfe was getting at.

---
Gary Jennejohn