From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 5 05:50:58 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C38CC37B401 for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 05:50:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from accord.grasslake.net (accord.grasslake.net [209.98.56.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6189043FAF for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 05:50:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from swb@grasslake.net) Received: from twinstar (twinstar.grasslake.net [192.168.1.2]) by accord.grasslake.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h35DZGMa010519 for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 07:35:21 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from swb@grasslake.net) Message-ID: <00b301c2fb7a$218b14a0$0201a8c0@twinstar> From: "Shawn Barnhart" To: Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 07:49:03 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: fwd and bridging X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 13:50:59 -0000 The manpage states that fwd rules (like for transparent proxying) will not match bridged packets. Will they ever, or is there some fundamental reason they can't?