Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:30:50 +0000
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        threads@freebsd.org, Tijl Coosemans <tijl@coosemans.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [Patch] C1X threading support
Message-ID:  <60233.1324315850@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:09:53 MST." <AC4BCD04-6555-4AD1-BBCD-3C706852ECCF@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <AC4BCD04-6555-4AD1-BBCD-3C706852ECCF@bsdimp.com>, Warner Losh write
s:

>There's a lot of prior art for the committee to choose from.

Same thing for struct packing to match a protocol specification.

And as for assert_mutex_held() I belive some of the prior art is only
a few hours longer than the word "mutex".

I really wonder what they think they are trying to do some times...


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?60233.1324315850>