Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 12:08:04 -0700 From: Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> To: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r208943 - head/usr.bin/calendar Message-ID: <AANLkTinLMLEnXI6Im-FFUmYCip7XBrdP_Z1qWNenzKNz@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201006091036.o59AaPMR096200@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201006091036.o59AaPMR096200@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 03:36, Edwin Groothuis <edwin@freebsd.org> wrote: > Author: edwin > Date: Wed Jun =A09 10:36:25 2010 > New Revision: 208943 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/208943 > > Log: > =A0fix memset() calls. > - =A0 =A0 =A0 memset(&tm, sizeof(struct tm), 0); > + =A0 =A0 =A0 memset(&tm, '\0', sizeof(struct tm)); Why use this novel spelling of 0 instead of simply reordering the arguments (which already used the normal invocation)?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTinLMLEnXI6Im-FFUmYCip7XBrdP_Z1qWNenzKNz>