Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 14:58:24 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru> To: Matthias Gamsjager <mgamsjager@gmail.com> Cc: michael@rancid.berkeley.edu, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Garrett Wollman <wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> Subject: Re: Leaving the Desktop Market Message-ID: <20140403075824.GA50437@regency.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BD9QhuPFH0LXSQzm1x8Xs=ZfBCc8EoO%2BVcVRZ%2BapP%2Bo3a9Ejw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAF6rxgkeBozvfV-L0%2BrFZ6fWRn0=Gi3BNq1kPL=-HTq0TD6MkQ@mail.gmail.com> <082a01cf4db9$240d3e90$6c27bbb0$@FreeBSD.org> <201404012240.s31MeIe4073267@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <20140403014419.GA45830@regency.nsu.ru> <CA%2BD9QhuPFH0LXSQzm1x8Xs=ZfBCc8EoO%2BVcVRZ%2BapP%2Bo3a9Ejw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 09:49:31AM +0200, Matthias Gamsjager wrote: > > There are a few alternatives to Lightroom available in Ports Collection, > > you might want to give them a try one day. > > > offtopic: > But it does not even come close to Lightroom. Gimp is also not even > close to Photoshop. Maybe Pixelmator. But Gimp? The UI and usability > is such a mess. Since when is GIMP an alternative to Lightroom? I was talking about raw processors, not raster image manipulators. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140403075824.GA50437>