From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep  8 07:22:05 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9547816A513; Wed,  8 Sep 2004 07:22:05 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5E2D143D41; Wed,  8 Sep 2004 07:22:05 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2])
	by gw.catspoiler.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i887LqGW040507;
	Wed, 8 Sep 2004 00:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org)
Message-Id: <200409080721.i887LqGW040507@gw.catspoiler.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 00:21:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org>
To: phk@phk.freebsd.dk
In-Reply-To: <34626.1094625991@critter.freebsd.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: jroberson@chesapeake.net
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: scottl@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/conf GENERIC src/sys/amd64/conf
 GENERIC src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC src/sys/pc98/conf GENERIC
 src/sys/sparc64/conf GENERIC 
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 07:22:06 -0000

On  8 Sep, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <20040908024335.T26496@mail.chesapeake.net>, Jeff Roberson writes:
> 
>>What's not working well enough with ULE to run with it?
> 
> On thing I have observed on my laptop is that it can take up to 30 seconds
> for a process to get a signal counting from when I type CTRL-C.

There is also the problem that CPU bound processes that are "nice" get
the same or slightly more CPU time than CPU bound processes that are not
"nice" when they are both in competition for CPU cycles.  The problem is
that both converge on the same priority, and even though the less nice
processes are assigned a longer time slice, they keep getting put at the
end of the run queue before they have used up their slice.