Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:00:33 -0800
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        mark@markdnet.demon.co.uk
Cc:        Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@burggraben.net>
Subject:   Re: Large port updates
Message-ID:  <20041207220033.GB31640@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20041207175217.3138143D46@mx1.FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20041207163843.GL9803@elch.haidundneu23.net> <20041207175217.3138143D46@mx1.FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 05:52:15PM +0000, mark@markdnet.demon.co.uk wrote:
> cmt@burggraben.net wrote:
>=20
> > Not in this case. Check /usr/ports/UPDATING 20041107:
> > : Do NOT use portupgrade(1) to update your GNOME 2.6 desktop to 2.8
>=20
> Last time this happened, this is what caused my to deinstall gnome. THe u=
pgrade script could take weeks to run on a reasonable spec machine because =
it insisted on rebuilding all sorts of stuff. You couldn't stop it, or it w=
ould start over.

So install from packages instead of ports, if you don't like to
compile things yourself.  Taking "weeks to run" is an extreme
exaggeration though, unless your "reasonable spec machine" is a 486.

> It seems to me that its a product of gnome being so many ports. Why
> not just have a few, like KDE (although it appears KDE is going the
> way of gnome - if this results in portupgrade not working there
> either, its insanity).

That doesn't make a lot of sense - you have to compile the same amount
of code whether it's in 5 packages or 20.  Regardless, it's the
decision the gnome project has made, and it's not up to the freebsd
project to do it differently.

Kris

P.S. Please wrap your lines at 70 characters so your emails may be
easily read.

--7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBtigBWry0BWjoQKURAqa9AKDkpGLt1CYOdt/RCtDllfeSw2oCJwCfbsow
Z1nQssaUZJwVA3ARIdDlR24=
=uWAm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041207220033.GB31640>