Date: Thu, 1 Jun 1995 05:39:03 -0500 (CDT) From: Peter da Silva <peter@bonkers.taronga.com> To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu Subject: Re: Problem with 2.0.5-Alpha and SMC Elite Ultra Message-ID: <199506011039.FAA04243@bonkers.taronga.com> In-Reply-To: <199506010738.RAA24640@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Jun 1, 95 05:38:06 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >Wait a minute, how come the change? I would expect that the vast vast majority
> >of cards out there are using soft settings, why not make the hard-settings
> >folks have to go into -c and leave it for soft settings as the normal case
> >(Which is the more common case afterall!)
> Because the old behaviour was a bug. Configuring the irq to anything other
> than "?" (-1 in userconfig) says that you really want that irq no matter
> what the soft settings say. You get soft settings for the normal case by
> saying what you mean ("irq ?") in the configuration.
What he's saying is, I think, that the default boot kernel should use IRQ ?.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506011039.FAA04243>