Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:22:24 +0400
From:      c0re <nr1c0re@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ipfw.ko and IPFIREWALL_FORWARD in GENERIC
Message-ID:  <AANLkTi=%2BP0dGznqQu736uCzHwjJkGDpZRUN3t9aMch5D@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100927193740.Q90633@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
References:  <AANLkTi=6RYR8CQc-HNTWgSGdEA3x-Q7VX5ywsidhXJQe@mail.gmail.com> <20100927193740.Q90633@sola.nimnet.asn.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks Ian.

Looks like switching to pf is the only option now.

2010/9/27 Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>:
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, c0re wrote:
>
> =A0> Is there any possibility to see IPFIREWALL_FORWARD option for ipfw.k=
o
> =A0> in GENERIC?
> =A0> Were there any patches about that?
> =A0> I like freebsd-update, but lacking IPFIREWALL_FORWARD in GENERIC sto=
ps
> =A0> me from using freebsd-update.
>
> In a nutshell, no. =A0This thread covers why not .. or at least, not yet:
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw/2010-March/004148.html
>
> cheers, Ian
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=%2BP0dGznqQu736uCzHwjJkGDpZRUN3t9aMch5D>