Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:39:13 +0000 (GMT)
From:      "Thomas Mueller" <mueller6727@bellsouth.net>
To:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   "options atapicam" and/or "device ATA_CAM" in kernel config?
Message-ID:  <20111123114340.04290106566C@hub.freebsd.org>

Next in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
What is the role of "options atapicam" and "device ATA_CAM" in kernel config file?

Are they redundant?  Kernel will build with both these options, but will it make things go awry?  Is ATA_CAM deprecated?

I am trying to burn a CD (or DVD) on a SATA DVD-RW drive, but cdrtools don't work.

Also, how do I build and install a kernel to some name other than /boot/kernel, and not build all modules in duplicate?

I might want to try kernels with some differences in options, but with the same modules.

NetBSD and Linux make it easy to choose a non-default name for the kernel, so I can have multiple kernels and choose one at boot.

In Linux, beginning with kernels 2.6.*, cdrtools work without the ATA-SCSI dance.

Tom




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111123114340.04290106566C>