From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 15 20:37:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356E016A4CE; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 20:37:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU [128.205.32.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7C7843D54; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 20:37:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (kensmith@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i3G3bm8o016782; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:37:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from kensmith@localhost) by electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id i3G3bmES016781; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:37:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:37:47 -0400 From: Ken Smith To: Marc Fonvieille Message-ID: <20040416033747.GA16273@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <200404141231.i3ECVgnb037966@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040415105223.GA771@zaphod.nitro.dk> <20040415205623.GA46098@abigail.blackend.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040415205623.GA46098@abigail.blackend.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org cc: "Simon L. Nielsen" cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/hubs article.sgml X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 03:37:49 -0000 On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 10:56:24PM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 12:52:23PM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > > In the text they are used to describe how much space each release, and > > now the release numbers will be updated without the space requirements > > being updated per release. Therefor new mirrors cannot easily see if > > the space requirements are out of date... > > > > I think you are right. Let's hubs people to confirm it and then I'll > back out the change. To be honest with you given the ports/ section of the FTP site is probably an order of magnitude larger than the next largest thing and tends to have a life of its own we might be best off just putting a date there instead of an OS revision. The CVS repository is probably the same - ports dwarfs the mainline system, and gnats/mailing-lists dwarfs ports. :-) If you agree I can revise the numbers to current estimates and put in "(as of April 2004)". -- Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel |