From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb 20 13:30:51 2012
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id 308921065670; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:30:51 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:30:51 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <20120220133051.GA84860@FreeBSD.org>
References: <20120219060053.GA45762@FreeBSD.org>
	<20120219150943.GA6673@magic.hamla.org>
	<20120219164528.GA48166@FreeBSD.org>
	<20120219175645.GA6833@magic.hamla.org>
	<20120219191106.GA71541@FreeBSD.org>
	<20120219203937.GA6943@magic.hamla.org>
	<20120220012336.GA41983@FreeBSD.org>
	<20120220024754.GB7587@magic.hamla.org>
	<20120220041449.GA65665@FreeBSD.org>
	<20120220060303.GA7722@magic.hamla.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120220060303.GA7722@magic.hamla.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: Eitan Adler <eadler@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/adime Makefile ports/x11-wm/icewm
	Makefile ports/graphics/scr2png Makefile ports/x11/xbindkeys
	Makefile
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree
	<cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:30:51 -0000

On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 01:03:04AM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 04:14:49 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > Right, sorry I didn't catch the point originally from mi@.  I was
> > viewing the issue from a limited angle.  Doug pointed out exact
> > deficiency in my thinking and provided real scenario when it can be a
> > bummer (that is, if one wants to hold shlib dependency while being
> > able to chase updates of the leaf ports).
> 
> Hm, I guess you missed mi@'s mention of such a scenario a few days ago,
> in the very same thread that I noted earlier in this discussion:
> 
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2012-February/073262.html

True, I must admit that I missed this piece.  Thanks for the pointers again
and sorry for giving you a hard time.  Sometimes I am slow and dumb. :-)

./danfe