From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 8 01:23:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3605C106564A; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 01:23:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (marcuscom-pt.tunnel.tserv1.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:ffff::1279]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7AC38FC12; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 01:23:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:2464::4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:2464::4]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o381Nbvw093542; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 21:23:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Beat Gaetzi In-Reply-To: <4BBCDB1F.4060107@FreeBSD.org> References: <4BB08760.3090906@FreeBSD.org> <1270408368.32902.37.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <4BBCDB1F.4060107@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-cR+nLLq/XxAl9WKRsJm2" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 21:23:31 -0400 Message-ID: <1270689811.42014.0.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HELO_NO_DOMAIN autolearn=no version=3.3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Updating security/nss X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 01:23:10 -0000 --=-cR+nLLq/XxAl9WKRsJm2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 21:21 +0200, Beat Gaetzi wrote: > Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 12:56 +0200, Beat Gaetzi wrote: > >> The upcoming update of SeaMonkey to 2.0.4 requires a newer version of > >> security/nss: > >> http://tmp.chruetertee.ch/seamonkey-2.0.4.log > >> > >> I've created a patch to update NSS to 3.12.6: > >> http://tmp.chruetertee.ch/nss-3126.patch > >> > >> With this version of NSS SeaMonkey 2.0.4 builds fine. I haven't done a= ny > >> further testing. I first want to ask if there are any plans for updati= ng > >> security/nss to a newer version? > >=20 > > We do not yet have it in MC. I have no objection to this patch being > > committed. >=20 > I've run a test on a tinderbox with 8.0-STABLE i386 and tested the ports > depending on security/nss with 3.12.6. Beside a build failure of ruby > (which doesn't look related to nss) I couldn't found a problem: > http://gecko.miwibox.org/index.php?action=3Dlist_buildports&build=3D8-Fre= eBSD_i386 >=20 > Also the update to 3.12.6 does not include a shlib bump so I think there > is no PORTREVISION bump of the depending ports needed. >=20 > Does this update somehow interfere with the upcoming gnome update? No, this should be fine to commit on its own. Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-cR+nLLq/XxAl9WKRsJm2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAku9MBEACgkQb2iPiv4Uz4ckdQCfSAx8ha16JMfJHgX7O8352Vw9 v3EAn2NkvYhqtohLOQMsQV7b/EfSfWz5 =SGGT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-cR+nLLq/XxAl9WKRsJm2--