Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 10:31:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Ken Marsh <durang@u.washington.edu> To: Adam Capell <adam.capell@learnps.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: colorls and linuxls Message-ID: <Pine.A32.3.92a.960821102851.63245A-100000@homer07.u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <199608192032.NAA25097@mail.learnps.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I made a symlink to ls named rls, then in my aliases that use more, I replaced ls with rls. That way ll gives me the long list in color, and llm pipes a regular non-color list into more. So I don't get color when I do the more list, but at lease I do have color when I do a regular or long list. I know this isn't what your really asking, but it is a way to make colorls very useful. Ken On Mon, 19 Aug 1996, Adam Capell wrote: > Why is it that when I pipe the output of either colorls or linuxls to > more, I get garbage? I suspect it has something to do with the extra > color information - 8-bit characters or ansi or whatever, but is > there any way to get around this? It doesn't make these binaries > very useful. Are there any parameters for my Console or > color_xterm I can use? > > Adam >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.A32.3.92a.960821102851.63245A-100000>