From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 12:26:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212C51065677 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 12:26:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevin.wilcox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E081E8FC13 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 12:26:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyj12 with SMTP id 12so1628084iyj.13 for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 05:26:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=U4svKZBkcnAp+MVDP6+F7afD0kYM2gfqbl1KBVGsR+Q=; b=h4zymjKCrvs8z7nE1EGGyHc1eSQeGJH+0rbUfe9H66VI3e+VFdHZSicnkfuCI+9O/5 iItG4GEOk7R+GFsa+eQGprJ9el/9nmTOxjMFovfH04Hps0+ol8f+62g+jfeTqqE0+pNO LWtARflVV10GaDBrOjeonE7TpaK79DXNFy+Rs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=u8LWYojagwveJAD6w9y6De//cLcaRvbkN5rxBbvV2AicTaC/N+D9VQadymlppSW6Tc 0v7khGtkROk6TMdob/dKnkGHt4dnXZ6+7B2sENoKpwBeVZLqOkzAJnAQ9nk43Fqtpw4p zL/CyzbqyyV04s4lax95sHxH7+5c4dR/U4sCU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.176.6 with SMTP id bc6mr471591ibb.147.1302092760015; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 05:26:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.192.72 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 05:25:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4d9c2078.LnLaXQYSyhcjq1va%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4d9c2078.LnLaXQYSyhcjq1va%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 08:25:59 -0400 Message-ID: From: Kevin Wilcox To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Free BSD Questions list Subject: Re: dhcpd in vmware X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 12:26:01 -0000 On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 04:12, wrote: > Kevin Wilcox wrote: > >> If you're just using the 192.168.4.129 - 254 addresses >> I would change it to >> >> subnet 192.168.4.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 > > Shouldn't that be netmask 255.255.255.128? That's what I thought at first as well. Then I saw the router at 192.168.4.1, so it looks like they're using the entire /24 but only assigning addresses via DHCPd to the top half. kmw