From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 22 22:39:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailgate.originative.com (mailgate.originative.com [195.149.39.165]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC57337B419 for ; Wed, 22 May 2002 22:39:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lobster.originative.co.uk (lobster.originative.co.uk [62.232.68.81]) by mailgate.originative.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91E01B250; Thu, 23 May 2002 06:39:30 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: Can this le NIC bug fix go in before 4.6? From: Paul Richards To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Andrew Heybey , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20020522182851.A72285@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <1020202795.36689.1094.camel@lobster.freebsd-services.com> <200205220301.g4M31qt56685@stiegl.mj.niksun.com> <20020522182851.A72285@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5 Date: 23 May 2002 06:39:30 +0100 Message-Id: <1022132370.68108.1.camel@lobster.originative.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 02:28, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 11:01:52PM -0400, Andrew Heybey wrote: > > > On Tue, 2002-04-30 at 22:19, Andrew Heybey wrote: > > > > I sent the following to freebsd-stable a while ago; could it please go > > > > into 4.6? It has been tested (according to feedback in PR 18641) by > > > > at least two people besides me. Sorry if this is an inappropriate > > > > mail to send to re@freebsd, but I am not sure who to send this to... > > > > > > I've been kindly donated some le cards recently so I will do my best to > > > take a look at this before 4.6. I need to get an ISA legacy box built > > > which will take me a while but I've got all the bits lying around, I > > > just need to find the time to put a box together. > > > > Any chance of the fix going into 4.6? > > Not really since the tree is already frozen and the fix isn't even in > -current yet. Lobby for the fix to be included into -current first > (on an appropriate development list, i.e. not this one). It's already been agreed that this will be done for 4.6 with re. I've tested the patch on with 4.6 and the only reason I've not committed it yet is because it looks like this already has been fixed in -current and I'm comparing the code to see how best to do this in 4.6. -- Paul Richards | FreeBSD DVD releases and merchandise. FreeBSD Services Ltd | Hardware, support and development. http://www.freebsd-services.com | Domain names and mail/web hosting. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message