Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 5 Dec 2003 15:36:47 -0800 (PST)
From:      Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: PERFORCE change 43464 for review
Message-ID:  <20031205152304.D27817@root.org>
In-Reply-To: <200312052059.hB5KxJAe055855@repoman.freebsd.org>
References:  <200312052059.hB5KxJAe055855@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
> Change 43464 by jhb@jhb_blue on 2003/12/05 12:59:01
>
> 	More updates.  Closer to working than I thought.  In theory
> 	PCI devices should all just work now.

This handles PCI.  Are you ok with me adding the call to
acpi_pwr_switch_consumer() for non-PCI devices like the embedded
controller?  I think we need to do this at the top \\_SB level.  I'm a bit
confused as to the handoff between the general tree walk and the ACPI-PCI
driver though.

-Nate



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031205152304.D27817>