Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 6 Dec 2013 09:13:26 +0100
From:      Luca Ferrari <fluca1978@infinito.it>
To:        iijima yoshino <iijimayoshino@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Why FreeBSD doesn't have a Gnome3 port?
Message-ID:  <CAKoxK+6=CdtntMJ-MRe9AqmmRcHM3EN_5HqUOYHEA1NvFRmcjw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1386253808.8359.5.camel@debian>
References:  <1386221592.4385.16.camel@debian> <CAKoxK+61HZPLR_xM7BC12dHc3y4eHPDCEvsRC8oQ_Jm1wUovnQ@mail.gmail.com> <1386253808.8359.5.camel@debian>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:30 PM, iijima yoshino <iijimayoshino@gmail.com> wrote:

> Even the OpenBSD team accepts the Gnome3 ...
> It seems the FreeBSD towards to a server-oriented way.
>

Why server oriented, just because gnome3 is not supported? Gnome3 is
only _a_ desktop among the others. So who is making FreeBSD more
"towards a server", FreeBSD itself or Gnome 3 that refuses to adopt
other non-linux facilities?
If other unixes have gnome3 it simply means they have manpower and
interest to port it. Not being a gnome3 user (actually, a gnome user
at all), I don't care about porting a desktop that is not interested
in being portable.

Luca



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAKoxK+6=CdtntMJ-MRe9AqmmRcHM3EN_5HqUOYHEA1NvFRmcjw>