Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 9 Apr 2015 15:17:09 -0600 (MDT)
From:      Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
To:        Matthew Seaman <matthew@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: LibreSSL infects ports, causes problems
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.20.1504091513500.1276@wonkity.com>
In-Reply-To: <5526A82E.3070609@freebsd.org>
References:  <slrnmib1ur.2jau.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> <5525E609.70402@FreeBSD.org> <20150409115942.GA81282@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> <20150409130521.GQ95321@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150409155345.GA87497@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> <20150409155649.GT95321@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <CAOp4FwS6%2BwkO1OPom5W6u6RHPNQaLXiyF-tR20Sq4=dyMV%2BcXw@mail.gmail.com> <20150409161407.GU95321@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <5526A82E.3070609@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 9 Apr 2015, Matthew Seaman wrote:

> On 04/09/15 17:14, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> For now candidates are:
>> libarchive
>> ncurses
>> readline (which will have then to be linked to ports ncurses and not base
>> version through the magic of fake libtermcap)
>> openssl
>> libedit(?)
>>
>
> One I noticed recently was in ftp/curl -- if you're using the ports
> version of OpenSSL you also have to use one of the ports versions of
> GSSAPI -- GSSAPI_HEIMDAL or GSSAPI_MIT, or else GSSAPI_NONE.
> Otherwise you can end up with two different SSL shlibs linked into the
> same binary.

That broke VirtualBox with some very weird and inconsistent symptoms:
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2015-March/012402.html



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.20.1504091513500.1276>