Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 Jun 2001 16:01:53 -0500
From:      "Michael C . Wu" <keichii@iteration.net>
To:        "Daniel C. Sobral" <daniel.sobral@tcoip.com.br>
Cc:        Kurt Seel <kseel@utcorp.com>, smp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Athlon AMD SMP Runs
Message-ID:  <20010628160153.A55976@peorth.iteration.net>
In-Reply-To: <3B3B988F.3060108@tcoip.com.br>; from daniel.sobral@tcoip.com.br on Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 05:50:23PM -0300
References:  <XFMail.010420152036.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <3B3669C1.ACC9DE02@utcorp.com> <20010625150400.C14321@peorth.iteration.net> <3B3B988F.3060108@tcoip.com.br>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 05:50:23PM -0300, Daniel C. Sobral scribbled:
| Michael C . Wu wrote:
| > On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 06:29:22PM -0400, Kurt Seel scribbled:
| > | John Baldwin wrote:
| > | > Completely stock -current as of Thursday on a dual Athlon test box graciously
| > | > provided by AMD with the prodding of David O`Brien.
| > | 
| > |  Might this mean that we can use those oh-so-fast dual
| > | athlon w/ DDR memory any time soon? As in will this
| > | support be back ported to -stable?
| > |  I always get a giggle when AMD eats Intel's lunch :-)
| > 
| > It already works.  Please read previous messages.
| ...
|  > | support be back ported to -stable?
| 
| It seems clear to me that the question was not answered by the previous 
| messages.

It already works on both RELENG_4(4.3-STABLE) and HEAD (5.0-CURRENT).
-- 
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| keichii@iteration.net         | keichii@freebsd.org       |
| http://iteration.net/~keichii | Yes, BSD is a conspiracy. |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010628160153.A55976>