Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 5 May 2011 18:54:22 -0400
From:      Alejandro Imass <>
Subject:   Re: rox-fm
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References:  <> <> <> <> <> <>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:35 PM, David Brodbeck <> wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Alejandro Imass <> wrote:
>> I wish someone could clearly explain why the reply-to field should
>> ONLY have the mailing-list address, or at least have as the default
>> address and not the other way around as it is here!
> This is one of the all-time great religious wars of the internet, on
> par with vi vs. Emacs and top-posting vs. bottom-posting.
> See for one
> side of the argument, and
> for the other side.

Man, that's hilarious! Using the same rhetoric but backwards!

Very cool read... and I was even kinda shy to ask, I mean so many
years on lists and I'd thought I had heard something on this respect
but never imagined it was actually a religious point.

Thanks again,


Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>