From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun 17 19:06:11 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74C516A41C;
	Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:06:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@ciam.ru)
Received: from mail.ciam.ru (mail.ciam.ru [213.147.57.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553B243D48;
	Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:06:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@ciam.ru)
Received: from [213.85.81.137] (helo=[192.168.0.2])
	by mail.ciam.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x)
	id 1DjMAM-0002ix-4g; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 23:06:10 +0400
Message-ID: <42B31F51.4050506@ciam.ru>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 23:06:57 +0400
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org>
References: <200506161937.j5GJb3sC023271@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<42B2A361.5000906@ciam.ru> <42B30931.4010901@FreeBSD.org>
	<42B3188F.70807@ciam.ru> <42B31A79.2070900@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <42B31A79.2070900@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ports@freebsd.org, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/59695: [PATCH] devel/gmake: add two patches to avoid core
 dumps
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:06:11 -0000

Ade Lovett wrote:
> No.  Sorry, but this is absolutely NOT going to happen.  The absolute
> last thing we need right now is to have two gmakes in the tree.  This
> will lead to serious confusion for absolutely minimal gain.

No confusion. If user installs -devel port, he understand he could meet 
problems.

> going nowhere.  I'm sorry, but the amount of pain likely to be caused by
> this does not justify the dubious benefits.  For instance, out of the
> 13,000 odd ports we have in the tree right now, I don't see gmake
> falling over on any of them with this particular issue.

Just because I can't add a port that affected the bugs.
The problem exist and it don't disappear if you say I see no problem.

--
Sem.