Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 17:20:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Ben Smithurst <ben@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/19262: Is fsync.2 NAME section wrong? Message-ID: <200007110020.RAA29628@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/19262; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ben Smithurst <ben@FreeBSD.org> To: nokubi@ff.iij4u.or.jp Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/19262: Is fsync.2 NAME section wrong? Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 01:15:00 +0100 nokubi@ff.iij4u.or.jp wrote: > Because I'm not native English speaker, I'm not sure about this. > But I have strange feeling about fsync.2 and sync.2 NAME section. > They say like this: > fsync - synchronize a file's in-core state with that on disk > sync - synchronize disk block in-core status with that on disk > > I think that fsync(2) and sync(2) write changes from memory to disk. > But these sentences make me feel like that they read from disk > to memory and discard changes. Yes, I see what you mean... > SUSV2 saids like this: > fsync - synchronise changes to a file > sync - schedule filesystem updates They seem a bit short to me, but I can't seem to come up with any wording that I like. :-( fsync - write all in-core changes of a file to disk sync - schedule an update of all modified filesystem data to disk ?? Are they better? Anyone care to comment? -- Ben Smithurst / ben@FreeBSD.org / PGP: 0x99392F7D To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007110020.RAA29628>