From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jan 12 04:29:48 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBB4CAC5A1 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 04:29:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from smtp3.irishbroadband.ie (smtp3.irishbroadband.ie [62.231.32.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5CDA1CAB for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 04:29:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from [89.127.62.20] (helo=smtp.lan.sohara.org) by smtp3.irishbroadband.ie with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1cRX18-000618-Bw for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 04:29:38 +0000 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.lan.sohara.org) by smtp.lan.sohara.org with smtp (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1cRX1n-0000LC-0m for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 04:30:19 +0000 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 04:29:32 +0000 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: spamassassin not lethal anymore Message-Id: <20170112042932.8122cad1de2080563f36b801@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: References: <2463a238-e10f-e81d-cab1-5a7eaf774590@pinyon.org> <20170111210507.2dc39818c6e9d439abb21ee6@sohara.org> <8016faa3-5af4-6c2d-acdf-9b02f7f1afc8@pinyon.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 04:29:49 -0000 On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 20:05:49 -0800 Kurt Buff wrote: > As Steve O'Hara Smith wrote, there are free services that can do that. > Perhaps he can mention which one he uses. I use the one provided by junkemailfilter.com, they provide two backup MXs the first accepts mail only when the primary MX is down, the second is a pure honey trap. I have no connection with them and no reason to believe their service is any better than any of the others around but I'm happy with it and the price is right. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith