From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 9 08:35:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A11516A4D0; Sun, 9 May 2004 08:35:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E1B43D39; Sun, 9 May 2004 08:35:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i486C9Od031485; Sat, 8 May 2004 00:12:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 00:12:55 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20040508.001255.39158392.imp@bsdimp.com> To: jhb@freebsd.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <200405071012.34816.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <20040507092840.24516.qmail@web14808.mail.yahoo.com> <200405071012.34816.jhb@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: rosti_bsd@yahoo.com cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question about "IRQ 2 problem" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 15:35:37 -0000 In message: <200405071012.34816.jhb@FreeBSD.org> John Baldwin writes: : On Friday 07 May 2004 05:28 am, Rostislav Krasny wrote: : > Hello everybody. : > : > About 5 monthes ago I wrote to this mailing list about the "IRQ 2 : > problem". You can read that discussion thread by following links: : > : > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2003-December/thread.html : > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2004-January/thread.html : > : > I just want to know what is the satus of this problem now? : > : > Thank you. : : Not fixed yet. Someone needs to sit down and verify if the resource manager : is silently adding in the IRQ 2 resource when it hasn't beek asked to. It seems that it hasn't been added via the normal APIs, but maybe there's some bugs there. I've found out that much. Warner