Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:03:09 +0200
From:      Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>
To:        Maxim Ignatenko <gelraen.ua@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [dummynet] Several queues connected to one pipe: "dummynet: OUCH! pipe should have been idle!"
Message-ID:  <20090427140309.GA62749@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
In-Reply-To: <ac42db050904270651g7019a6bu4af133107540c860@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <ac42db050904260732t74caa942x89d305dabfff5158@mail.gmail.com> <20090426215740.GA33188@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <ac42db050904261512k32f9306ald4bff106e715fb61@mail.gmail.com> <20090426224729.GA34800@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <ac42db050904270651g7019a6bu4af133107540c860@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:51:18PM +0300, Maxim Ignatenko wrote:
> 2009/4/27 Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>:
> >
> > ok there seems to be no change related to dummynet between these
> > two versions so I am not sure where to look.
> > Could you double check what is the last working version ?
> >
>  Yes, r191201 have this problems too (it seems, i didn't updated for a
> long time).
> Now  I updated to r190864 (just before last change on ip_dummynet.c) -
> all works fine. Should I now check r190865?

yes it would be great if you could identify a specific change that
caused the problem.
There is one thing particularly tricky in one of the dummynet
changes, because some fields changed between 32/64 bits and
signed/unsigned. I may have unadvertently introduced some
conversion bug.

thanks a lot for the feedback

cheers
luigi



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090427140309.GA62749>