Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 19:48:28 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: eculp <eculp@encontacto.net> Cc: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Problem with apr1 that could be shared with libX11 and libSM that I have reported previously. Message-ID: <4BF5F47C.1010509@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20100520183258.12803uuar50i044k@econet.encontacto.net> References: <20100520142452.111014tebuyeocqo@econet.encontacto.net> <4BF58E14.3050000@FreeBSD.org> <20100520183258.12803uuar50i044k@econet.encontacto.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/20/2010 4:32 PM, eculp wrote: > Quoting Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>: > >> On 5/20/2010 12:24 PM, eculp wrote: >>> I used postmaster and the results for trying to builds apr1 can be seen >>> at http://www.vitalagua.mx//apr1.txt >>> >>> To me it seems to be related to configuration versions of tools like >>> automake and autoconf but I can't find it. >> >> This doesn't look like a portmaster problem, can you try again simply >> building in the port directory and see if you get the same result? > > Doug, I apologize for having even insinuated that postmaster might be at > fault. Oh, I wasn't concerned about that, don't worry. I just wanted to be sure that portmaster actually was NOT at fault. :) Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BF5F47C.1010509>