From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 25 14:20:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A52516A4CE for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 14:20:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4642943D1F for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 14:19:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1] (may be forged)) i8PEJrit031637 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 25 Sep 2004 15:19:53 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)i8PEJrWa031636; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 15:19:53 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 15:19:53 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Jens Schweikhardt Message-ID: <20040925141953.GA31324@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Jens Schweikhardt , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20040925130829.GA9706@schweikhardt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040925130829.GA9706@schweikhardt.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sat, 25 Sep 2004 15:19:54 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040904, clamav-milter version 0.75l on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What are duplicate INDEX entries and why do I have them? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 14:20:00 -0000 --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 03:08:29PM +0200, Jens Schweikhardt wrote: > out of curiosity, with a ports tree cvsup'ed right now and checked out > (and for the last months as well) I see >=20 > portsdb -Uu > Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait.. > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: freeciv-gtk2-1.14.1 > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: mod_jk2-apache2-2.0.2 > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: mod_rpaf-ap2-0.5 > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: fvwm-imlib-2.4.18 > Done. >=20 > Does anyone else have duplicate INDEX entries? Is something stale in > my ports tree? That's normal and harmless. It happens because you've got WANT_APACHE2=3Dyes set in /etc/make.conf (or equivalent), and because you've got GTK2 and imlib installed. Those four ports are all slave ports fairly similar to their masters but just with a changed dependency or linking in some optional code or whatever. However their master ports are attempting to be a bit too clever for their own good. They detect that you have whatever setting or facility makes the difference between themselves and their slave port and rename themselves accordingly. Hence master and slave ports both end up with the same name. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBVX6JiD657aJF7eIRAsTQAKCC3siEQQ77tB6SxoWcKjUCUNDykQCgnJ/H EfwyaDZanwDLytA4/V5zn7g= =UcNJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk--