From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Dec 25 7:45:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from hex.databits.net (hex.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.203]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B36FE37B416 for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 07:45:20 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 42994 invoked by uid 1001); 25 Dec 2001 15:45:17 -0000 Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 10:45:17 -0500 From: Pete Fritchman To: Daeron Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Request for all ports Message-ID: <20011225104517.B42161@databits.net> References: <1098.192.168.167.6.1009294752.squirrel@192.168.167.1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <1098.192.168.167.6.1009294752.squirrel@192.168.167.1>; from daeron@fandom.net on Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 02:39:12AM +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org ++ 26/12/01 02:39 +1100 - Daeron: | Could you include in your guidelines for ports directories a request that | everyone use "CONFIGURE_ARGS+=" instead of a "CONFIGURE_ARGS=" to allow | people to pass additional parameters without having to hack the Makefile. | Perhaps you could consider running a script to update any existing | port-Makefiles seeming it is such a small change? I agree with you. What do others think? I'd be willing to do the change, as well. -- Pete Fritchman [petef@(databits.net|freebsd.org|csh.rit.edu)] finger petef@databits.net for PGP key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message