Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:28:47 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org> Cc: kan@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: libstdc++ version bump. Message-ID: <20050628182847.GB92486@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <200506281844.07644.lofi@freebsd.org> References: <20050628154627.GJ40423@elvis.mu.org> <790a9fff05062809211c27a435@mail.gmail.com> <200506281844.07644.lofi@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 06:44:02PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Tuesday, 28. June 2005 18:21, Scot Hetzel wrote: > > > Are you sure that the problem is with libstdc++ and not the above > > libraries? > > Yes, it's a well known-fact. In fact there might have been a break of ABI > backwards-compatibility between gcc 3.3 and 3.4, too, but I'm not sure. There was. 3.3 could support either the C++ ABI of GCC 3.2, in which there was an implementation bug; or the fixed ABI of 3.4. I had hoped we had gone with the fixed ABI rather than being G++ 3.2 compatible, but that is what users wanted at the time. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050628182847.GB92486>