Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:10:15 +0400
From:      Max Brazhnikov <makc@freebsd.org>
To:        Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com>
Cc:        cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-wm/stumpwm Makefile
Message-ID:  <201006162210.15931.makc@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <86sk4msvtj.fsf@gmail.com>
References:  <201006141228.o5ECSADC004581@repoman.freebsd.org> <86sk4msvtj.fsf@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:59:04 +0400, Anonymous wrote:
> Max Brazhnikov <makc@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > makc        2010-06-14 12:28:10 UTC
> > 
> >   FreeBSD ports repository
> >   
> >   Modified files:
> >     x11-wm/stumpwm       Makefile
> >   
> >   Log:
> >   Build with lang/sbcl by default, clisp lacks x11 module
> >   
> >   Revision  Changes    Path
> >   1.8       +1 -1      ports/x11-wm/stumpwm/Makefile
> 
> I think PORTREVISION should be bumped, too. This case matches one in
> Porter's Handbook:
> 
>   Examples of when PORTREVISION should be bumped:
>    - Changes to the port Makefile to enable or disable compile-time
>      options in the package.
> 
The port failed to build before fix, no need for rising PORTREVISION in this 
case.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201006162210.15931.makc>