Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:28:46 +1100 (EST)
From:      Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
To:        Nickolay Dudorov <nnd@mail.nsk.ru>
Cc:        FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: conf/60329: There is no 'device ataraid' in NOTES
Message-ID:  <20031218161857.L19014@gamplex.bde.org>
In-Reply-To: <200312171214.hBHCEPU0000755@nnd.itfs.nsk.su>
References:  <200312171214.hBHCEPU0000755@nnd.itfs.nsk.su>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Nickolay Dudorov wrote:

> >Description:
>
> 	Some time ago 'device ataraid' was introduced ad now
> is necessary for ATA RAID controllers usage. But there is no
> 'device ataraid' in any NOTES files (only in GENERIC).
>
> >How-To-Repeat:
>
> 	cd /sys; find . -name NOTES -print -and grep ataraid \{\{ \;

According to `ls ../GENERIC >/dev/null` in the LINT object directory,
the following files are built for GENERIC but not for LINT:

    aic7xxx_reg_print.o
    ata-raid.o
    if_axe.o
    if_bfe.o
    if_em.o
    if_em_hw.o
    if_re.o

These correspond to the following options and drivers being missing in
NOTES:

    AHC_REG_PRETTY_PRINT
    ataraid
    axe
    bfe
    em
    re

The AHC options are also bogusly commented on in conf/options.  This leads
to other bugs in NOTES like some of the AHC options not being commented on
there.

Bruce



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031218161857.L19014>