From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 17 17:39:03 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F6216A41A for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:39:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF2D513C469; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:39:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <471648B6.5020602@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:39:02 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bengt Ahlgren References: <20071004165755.GA1049@pp.htv.fi> <47120D83.1010703@FreeBSD.org> <20071015203202.GA17964@pp.htv.fi> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reproducable, possibly NFS related, fatal double fault in 6.2-R-p7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:39:03 -0000 Bengt Ahlgren wrote: > Esa Karkkainen writes: > >> On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 02:37:23PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote: >>> Esa Karkkainen wrote: >>>> I get "Fatal double fault" error when writing to a filesystem >>>> mounted from NFS server. >> I got an offlist reply in which he suggested that the problem might be >> in nve driver. > > That was me. I indeed got the same fault when running NFS over nve. > Switching to nfe solved the problem for me. The on-screen backtrace > reveals the true location of the problem. See: > > http://www.sics.se/~bengta/FBSD/DSC00585.JPG > > I do have a dump, but for some reason kgdb is not able to show the > same information. If you're using a module you have to do extra (but documented) steps. Or maybe kgdb has forgotten how to decode a double fault. Anyway, this information is indeed definitive, and it's what others seeing this problem need to provide if they still have doubts. Kris