From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org  Tue Feb 23 22:48:48 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8848CAB2D0A
 for <freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 23 Feb 2016 22:48:48 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79AA3D46
 for <freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 22:48:48 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u1NMmmR1025317
 for <freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 22:48:48 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 165146] [net80211] Net802.11 Fragment number is assigned 1
 (should be 0) when fragmenting a frame
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 22:48:48 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: wireless
X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: avos@freebsd.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Unable to Reproduce
X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc resolution bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-165146-21060-YJJa3RaUJi@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-165146-21060@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-165146-21060@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack,
 tools device driver development." <freebsd-wireless.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-wireless>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-wireless/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 22:48:48 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D165146

Andriy Voskoboinyk <avos@freebsd.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |avos@freebsd.org
         Resolution|---                         |Unable to Reproduce
             Status|In Progress                 |Closed

--- Comment #2 from Andriy Voskoboinyk <avos@freebsd.org> ---
(In reply to monthadar from comment #0)
> I found that in FreeBSD current the first fragment will have a
> fragment number =3D 1 in function ieee80211_fragment.

Sequence/fragment number for the first fragment (m0) is left unmodified;
fragno (1+) is applied for subsequent fragments only.

Tested with Intel 3945BG (fragthreshold 300 + some printf() code for
sequence/fragment number monitoring) - everything works as intended.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=