From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 10 00:00:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A4716A4CE for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 00:00:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8694443FB1 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 00:00:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAA80iFY010340 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 00:00:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hAA80irD010338; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 00:00:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 00:00:44 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200311100800.hAA80irD010338@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Mark Linimon Subject: Re: ports/41282: New_Ports japanese/stevie-* X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mark Linimon List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 08:00:45 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 08:00:45 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/41282; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Linimon To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, zau50357@lion.zero.ad.jp Cc: Subject: Re: ports/41282: New_Ports japanese/stevie-* Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 02:59:50 +0000 Is the original submitter still interested in these ports, or should this aging PR just be closed?