Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:45:24 +0100
From:      Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl>
To:        Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Compose key and xterm vs. UTF-8
Message-ID:  <20100314114524.GB25702@slackbox.erewhon.net>
In-Reply-To: <hnh9td$ph3$1@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>
References:  <hnh9td$ph3$1@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--oC1+HKm2/end4ao3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 12:16:45AM +0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Short:
> ------
> Why do compose key sequences fail to work in a UTF-8 xterm?

The port x11/rxvt-unicode is lighter on resources then xterm, and works fine
with utf-8. (with LANG=3Den_US.UTF-8 and LC_ALL=3Den_US.UTF-8 set)

Roland
--=20
R.F.Smith                                   http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914  B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)

--oC1+HKm2/end4ao3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkuczFQACgkQEnfvsMMhpyXMPgCgmB74fgdQxTC3zI/lQfENaNs1
/R8Anj2wIaR0kuJU2OnZ92ZYJ3wQsKt1
=V4mS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--oC1+HKm2/end4ao3--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100314114524.GB25702>