Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 09:55:27 -0700 From: Zachary Loafman <zachary.loafman@isilon.com> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subversion documentation for the FreeBSD project? Message-ID: <20080604165527.GC31784@zloafman.west.isilon.com> In-Reply-To: <e7db6d980806040021od995007y9de14ba04f0717df@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080603164503.GC1592@roadrunner.spoerlein.net> <p06240803c46b2d451333@128.113.124.153> <20080603181505.GF1592@roadrunner.spoerlein.net> <e7db6d980806040021od995007y9de14ba04f0717df@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 12:21:09AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > So, I foolishly volunteered to do an evolutionary step and make the > ``uninspired'' choice. I know svn can work for us. We don't have to > deal with the whole workflow model at the same time. Thanks for all your work. I think you made the right choice, and the only way this was going to get done was if someone actually devoted the time to do it. As a vendor that runs svn internally, I think the switch should help. We're still trying to figure out how best to mirror parts of the FreeBSD svn repo into our own, but I think this should ease parts of our merge pain going forward. -- Zach Loafman | Staff Engineer | Isilon Systems
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080604165527.GC31784>