Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 9 Jul 1996 08:00:32 -0600
From:      Sean Kelly <kelly@fsl.noaa.gov>
To:        rashid@rk.ios.com
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: de0 when bt0 is present == much sadness
Message-ID:  <199607091400.OAA18700@gatekeeper.fsl.noaa.gov>
In-Reply-To: <199607091334.JAA03426@rk.ios.com> (message from Rashid Karimov on Tue, 9 Jul 1996 09:34:10 -0400 (EDT))

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "Rashid" == Rashid Karimov <rashid@rk.ios.com> writes:

    Rashid> 	This is weird ... one shouldn't assign specific IRQ to
    Rashid> the driver IMO . Take a look at /sys/i386/conf/GENERIC at
    Rashid> your PC.

I didn't assign an IRQ to bt0.  And, just for fun, I tried booting
with the GENERIC kernel from the 2.1.0R boot floppy and it suffered
from the same problem.  Upon probing bt0, it assigns a handler for
IRQ15.  Then, upon probing de0, it complains that a handler's already
assigned.

    Rashid> 	I've had enough of these combos - de0 + bt0, they all
    Rashid> wroked fine. Check your BIOS setup for IRQs given to PCI
    Rashid> subsystem ( slots).

That they worked for you does inspire hope for me.  Were your bt0's
the PCI version?

Anyway, my CMOS isn't that great (Phoenix)---it allows me to set
the IRQ for the three PCI slots (currently set at 15) and set which
slots are masters or slaves, device latency, and whether to enable the
slot.

Other ideas?

-- 
Sean Kelly                          
NOAA Forecast Systems Laboratory    kelly@fsl.noaa.gov
Boulder Colorado USA                http://www-sdd.fsl.noaa.gov/~kelly/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607091400.OAA18700>