Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:13:33 +0200
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com>
To:        Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Cc:        Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>, FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Why Clang
Message-ID:  <CAGwOe2bSwAp5jfaQstYY%2BLmjjXNx31JW%2BgRTo3_KLYdYrqHC_w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206192154110.98802@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References:  <402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <CAH3a3KWKNF5Bt-8=KgtbMh=rV6GfUO7OaeE6-SutxkcRe8cG3Q@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206191953280.8234@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20120619205225.21d6709f.freebsd@edvax.de> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206192154110.98802@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Wojciech Puchar
<wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:
>>>
>>> Does GPLv3 does force programs you compile with gcc to be GPLed?
>>
>>
>> As far as I know, the main difference is that the GPLv3 is
>> often called a "viral license". Software linking against v3
>> libraries and so maybe programs compiled by a v3 compiler
>> will have - according to the license - to be released as
>> v3 too.
>
> This word: "MAYBE" is most crucial here.

I don't see how GPLv3 is viral.

Here[1] we can read a program linking agains a gpl v3 library should be released
under the gplv3 too. However, the only concern would be when the program is
implicitly linked against libgcc right? Well, there's even an
exception[2] for this.

I'm not saying moving to clang is a bad idea. I just don't think the
viral license
argumentation is strong enough.

Can anyone provide an example of viral propagation of the license if we compile
the base system with a gpl v3 gcc?

Thanks.

[1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#IfLibraryIsGPL
[2] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#LibGCCException

>
> wouldn't it be just simplest solution to ask GNU leader for clearing it out?
>
> i wouldn't be surprised that FreeBSD team would decide to go back to gcc
> soon.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGwOe2bSwAp5jfaQstYY%2BLmjjXNx31JW%2BgRTo3_KLYdYrqHC_w>