Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 22:44:12 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Steven Hartland <steven@multiplay.co.uk>, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r286223 - head/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs Message-ID: <20150803194412.GC8792@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <55BFC296.5050402@freebsd.org> References: <201508030934.t739YAkT026668@repo.freebsd.org> <20150803094730.GA24698@zxy.spb.ru> <55BF431E.3020601@freebsd.org> <2757800.HIDNx1G49O@overcee.wemm.org> <20150803111942.GB2072@kib.kiev.ua> <55BF557B.60009@multiplay.co.uk> <20150803120359.GC2072@kib.kiev.ua> <55BFC296.5050402@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 03:35:50AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 8/3/15 8:03 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 12:50:19PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: > >> For this change I don't want to get into fixing the thread0 stack size, > >> which can be done later, just > >> to provide a reasonable warning to the user that smaller values could > >> cause a panic. > > Hmm, is it limited to the thread0 only ? I.e., would only increasing > > the initial thread stack size be enough to boot the kernel ? The zfs > > threads do request larger stack size, I know this. > > > > Can somebody test the following patch in the i386 configuration which > > does not boot ? > > I think this is a reasonable thing to do. Thread0 (and proc0) are special. > I don't see why giving it a specially sized stack would be a problem. This is always do for ARM. May be need increase stack size for Thread0 on ARM too?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150803194412.GC8792>