From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 19:42:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F224F1A for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:42:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [50.250.218.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45194E65 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:42:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D9FFD6D86BA9; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:42:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:42:38 -0800 From: David Benfell To: Paul Macdonald Subject: Not really RESOLVED, but also not php55's fault: Re: php55 change on datetime functions? Message-ID: <20150129194238.GB50850@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20150128081145.GA17133@home.parts-unknown.org> <54CA6069.7080804@ifdnrg.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54CA6069.7080804@ifdnrg.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:42:40 -0000 --Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 04:31:37PM +0000, Paul Macdonald wrote: > On 28/01/2015 08:11, David Benfell wrote: > > SQLSTATE[22007]: Invalid datetime format > try this? > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17598629/mysql-incorrect-datetime-form= at >=20 Actually, it turned out the blame for this lies with Drupal. I even reproduced it on drupal.org. (No, I really do not go around trying to induce errors on other people's sites. Facepalm. I was trying to add a note to a similar bug report.) It never even occurred to me that some weird characters--emoji actually--might be a problem. But they are for Drupal: https://www.drupal.org/node/2260317/revisions/view/7217519/7217521 --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUyo0uAAoJEBV64x4SNmAr6A0QAKi9uW4BI6Tnjxx1Z1OSwKvq qCIf1PjFVwGcHPAcoxPYxDeKMqvP1paZMPTdq/zRofi72AMB7ysvl6GQNRis06e+ aMHUqL+nc3XGsv5XimfJKq4uizqWSCEpsyW06h4R61xmmBLAPbLuo4ConR2PvRCr Zj6+TatHHe85RtuqTuSWqCMLfHjEPrhLGYLUGdSwNjXrynG1nSTZKjCsTjeWox/n f5XLTrxHk0zgcTeVK0xKMVV6B/d/hik92ycRqSHlradGTuhdxHSIwF/IW3mqAAVE rjPz2QugXOm5o2C+S/M51eLpQsAUYaVE/dgy7b4Ek8G5jf6c+x5dsDUPwfWtKUWE EfISIqgB4qDHFsfCQhps5As/1YGKNhlGDop43vMQd/NAQ+OPsCkF8v/UmOTAJfL0 9i3Q2YVOg3odQVOdzT7wZougn0Ig5M3dZYaAjU3KmSjHaiMxDfLG2Us+rPImqCnF lQJoQGrNL88BMcpj7ZB7nbajqS1+DeILurZ4n9QZx0NrZsd0U1Lw3TXIZUgXa/+w rm2s38+dq5K2ifnj2yA6156dUyyTKdBeUwQRSH2pas5iA3GLYILNJhTrbGwar3/j 7JEUBPIYO0pPqVhkWt4ZSMfA4OfKu4tflJyAF6UQEIh3udOaHtCZjkcACYnIcsKN i+WiqLQuiSdrgah2L9P6 =/TtJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU--